Medidas para garantizar la libertad de expresión en Internet

A raíz del reciente caso de censura sufrido por el bloguer y periodista chino Michael Anti, la organización Reporteros Sin Fronteras ha propuesto una serie de medidas para obligar a las empresas estadounidenses a respetar la libertad de expresión, también cuando operan fuera de los Estados Unidos: Do Internet companies need to be regulated to ensure they respect free expression?

El texto, que ha sido remitido también a la Unión Europea y a la OECD, plantea las siguientes iniciativas:

E-mail services

No US company would be allowed to host e-mail servers within a repressive country*. So, if the authorities of a repressive country want personal information about the user of a US company???s e-mail service, they would have to request it under a procedure supervised by US.

Search engines

Search engines would not be allowed to incorporate automatic filters that censor ???protected??? words. The list of ???protected??? keywords such as ???democracy??? or ???human rights??? should be appended to the law or code of conduct.

Content hosts (websites, blogs, discussion forums etc)

US companies would not be allowed to locate their host servers within repressive countries. If the authorities of a repressive country desire the closure of a publication hosted by a US company, they would have to request it under a procedure supervised by the US judicial authorities. Like search engines, content hosts would not be allowed to incorporate automatic filters that censor ???protected??? key-words.

Internet censorship technologies

Reporters Without Borders proposes two options:

Option a : US companies would no longer be permitted to sell Internet censorship software to repressive states.

Option b : They would still be able to market this type of software but it will have to incorporate a list of ???protected??? keywords that are rendered technically impossible to censor.

Internet surveillance technology and equipment

US companies would have to obtain the express permission of the Department of Commerce in order to sell to a repressive country any technology or equipment which can be used to intercept electronic communications or which is specifically designed to assist the authorities in monitoring Internet users.

Training

US companies would have to obtain the express permission of the Department of Commerce before providing any programme of training in Internet surveillance and censorship techniques in a repressive country.

Relacionados: Otro bloguer chino bloqueado y Declaración sobre la libertad de expresión en Internet

Actualización

Versión en español: Responsabilidad de las empresas : Reporteros sin Fronteras hace un llamamiento a internautas y bloggers para que apoyen sus recomendaciones sobre la libertad de expresión

votar       

Imprimir este post   



3 comentarios

#1 Mangas Verdes el 9 Jan 2006 a las 11:9

Empresas y libertad de expresión

Reporteros sin Fronteras plantea una serie de medidas para que las empresas estadounidenses respete la libertad de expresión incluso en China

#2 Cobertura Digital el 10 Jan 2006 a las 01:10

Josè Luis, mientras en China, se trata de coartar la libertad de expresión en forma oficial, un sitio oficial del TLC intenta abrir el diálogo desde el poder con otro blog dedicado al TLC (http://www.manuelchiriboga.blogspot.com) que puede mostrar la otra cara de la moneda

Christian Espinosa B.
Profesor de Nuevos Medios

#3 Mangas Verdes » Yahoo pide un frente com?n contra China el 15 Feb 2006 a las 01:15

[...] Actualizaci?n (15 feb-00.53 h): Jos? Luis nos avisa en los comentarios de que el movimiento ya est? en marcha. Se lee en 1’15 minutos PDF – Enviar – Imprimir Technorati tags: [...]

Escribir un comentario



Entradas (posiblemente) relacionadas